I noticed a lot of new terms in the material, and I was most impressed by the MOOC, which came about because only a small percentage of kids really had access to good courses at prestigious schools due to space limitations. So some educators proposed to spread the word through the power of the Internet: to put these courses online.
I’ll try to make an interesting classification below. If we compare knowledge to meat (nutritious and good for people), online education is insect meat (more nutritious, but less accepted); offline education is poultry meat (nutritious and accepted, but bad for people if they eat too much).
In my opinion, the goal of MOOC is to enable those who cannot eat poultry meat to eat insect meat and ensure their health. The difficulties faced by the hope of ensuring the quality of the meat through various improvements to the MOOC (assessment, certification, etc.) are that there are too many places without internet and equipment, requiring a lot of human and material resources, and little possibility of profit.
And the purpose of online education is to hope that people who can eat poultry meat can also eat insect meat. The difficulty is that the acceptance is so low that a small percentage of people can be attracted to try it, but most people can’t eat it. But at one point I heard the phrase: The hope for meat is in insects. (Less consumption, high nutrition).
Finally, I have a very concerned question: Is there any other value of the MOOC certificate besides the commemorative value? For example, can it be used to apply to universities? When I browsed the webpage, Harvard’s Office of Undergraduate Admissions noted that the act of taking a MOOC course is “something very interesting that we want to know about you.”
Although this comment from Harvard could be interpreted differently, the tone at least sounds like taking a MOOC doesn’t help the application as well, and can’t be compared to an applicant’s official degree or transcripts. So I consider the MOOC to be more of an extra-curricular activity.
Major, C. H. (2015). Teaching Online – A Guide to Theory, Research, and Practice. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uvic/detail.action?docID=3318874 (pp. 76-108)
boyue
Hi Susie, I really like your point about MOCC, online learning technology can really help us to find a new way to get knowledge. MOCC should have more apply in multi purpose, include higher education.
ruobingbai
Hi, Susie
Thanks for sharing, I quite agree with you. MOOCs are good for a small number of people, making them “nutritionally balanced”. And most MOOCs are free to help this small group of people. In your search although it didn’t help with college applications in your study, it enabled a small number of people to acquire the knowledge they desired and so on. Maybe without MOOCs, their minds are limited to a small place. With MOOCs, they can learn more and see more.
Ruobing Bai
haoliangwu
Thank you for the post! You used vivid metaphors to make your point, which made me understand your point better. As u raised the question, I searched some information, The most of the companies, they would prefer traditional degrees to MOOCs but
“MOOCs are popular for workers who participate in less formal labor markets, such as piece-rate work online”. I hope it would help you!